The critical stance on Novak Djokovic’s release comes back to Scott Morrison


It came as no surprise that Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison was embroiled in a controversy over the immunization of tennis player Novak Djokovic to play in the first Grand Slam of the year.

Other than that, the Morrison government was beaten with the number of Omicron cases, shambolic test machines and empty shelves just months before the election.

When Djokovic, a world-class tennis player who did not get a male vaccine, announced that he was flying to Melbourne to defend his Australian Open title, Morrison, whose Liberal Party is following Labor in the election, committed a heinous crime.

The Prime Minister warned that Djokovic, who is still in the air, could be reinstated on the “first flight home”. Djokovic’s visa was duly revoked and was arrested waiting to be evicted.

But the decision of the federal court to to prevent visa revocation Monday has embarrassed the Morrison government and is looking into the issue of immigration laws in Australia, a country that prides itself on its strict borders.

The disruption of the uncircumcised athlete has proved to be extremely difficult for voters who have experienced other global challenges. more complex restrictions.

The court ruling has left the Morrison government with two unconstitutional political options.

It may decide to suspend Djokovic’s visa, although Morrison has announced that the player is not allowed to stay in the country. Or it could revoke the visa and lock it up. This, however, can control a diplomatic conflict by the Serbian government as well as street demonstrations in Melbourne, which have just emerged from the world’s closest Covid-19 closure.

Morrison insisted last week that Djokovic was being treated in much the same way as anyone else trying to “cross the border” in Australia.

Scott Morrison government faces two unpopular political elections in Novak Djokovic © Lukas Coch / AAPIMAGE

The situation was welcomed by some Australians who were outraged when they heard that Djokovic, who appeared to be in good health, had been granted free will despite the country’s strict vaccination laws.

Mark Kenny, a professor at The Australian Studies Institute, said the government was in serious trouble because of the rising risk of disease, the risk of Covid testing and cyberbullying. But it “smelled” voters who were angry with Djokovic’s arrival.

“It was clear that Morrison was happy to look strong at the frontier without mentioning the many failures in Covid’s experiment. It seemed for a while if Morrison won,” Kenny said.

For more than two decades, the Liberal Party has made reforming its borders a major part of its policies. The decision to revoke Djokovic’s visa will again be made by Alex Hawke, the immigration minister and one of the prime minister’s closest associates.

A government official stated: “According to the official policy, Hawke’s prime minister is well-versed in the matter. As the case progresses, for legal reasons it is not necessary to comment further. ”

Maria Jockel at BDO Migration Services said the minister who uses his powers to ban visas had never been seen. But it should be justified on the basis of merit and possibly objectionable, which would open the Australian border law for further consideration.

He added that governments and governments “collectively seek Solomon’s wisdom” in order to find a solution to border problems such as those raised by Djokovic’s saga.

Strict immigration laws in Australia have been changed since Djokovic was arrested at the Tullamarine airport in Melbourne last week. The player’s visa was issued by the federal government and his medical exemption was signed by two independent medical professional groups, one sponsored by the Victorian government, and issued by a senior Australian Tennis doctor.

But this did not convince him to enter the country and court documents show that Djokovic may have mistyped another document – a travel notice – which is different from a visa.

Kenny said the idea of ​​issuing a visa if it was available to uncircumcised people who could not meet the requirements for entry, forced border guards to “consider a second option”. “The ambiguity has crept into the process,” he said.

State and federal government and Tennis Australia have tried to file charges in the dispute, with compelling reasons – that Djokovic made a deal with Covid-19 in the last six months – have been heated.

Daniel Andrews, Victoria’s Prime Minister, confirmed Tuesday that his government had not set boundaries. “We did not try to persuade the Commonwealth government to allow anyone to enter. Instead, it was very different,” he said.

Anthony Albanese, Labor leader who will compete for a new prime minister in the coming months, said: “Scott Morrison has failed to test, follow, vaccinate and isolate. It is a serious problem of epidemic failure.”

Even some of Morrison’s councilors have called on the government to drop the case. John Alexander, a Liberal MP and former professional tennis player, said it would be “wrong” to try to oust Djokovic after a court ruling. “I see it as a problem that should not be a political issue,” he told Australia’s ABC broadcaster.

However Kenny argued that it was already a political problem for the government. Kenny states: “It could have doubled in my mind. “Either way there is a political price in Morrison.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *